Is Patanjali’s Desi Cow Ghee Even Cow Ghee?

By Priyanka Pathak-Narain | 2 August 2017

Priyanka Pathak-Narain is a journalist who covered religion and business for the newspaper Mint for several years. In her book, Godman to Tycoon: the Untold Story of Baba Ramdev, Pathak-Narain covers his rise from a yoga guru in Haridwar to founding and running what is now India’s second-largest fast-moving consumer good, or FMCG, company—the Patanjali group. She writes about how he secured prime slots at devotional channels such as Aastha TV; his role in the anti-corruption movement of 2011; as well as the crimes that appear to surround him—including the mysterious deaths of his two associates, Rajeev Dixit and Swami Yogananda, and the disappearance of his guru, Shankar Dev.

Pathak-Narain writes in the book that Ramdev can be credited in large part for the revival of the Ayurveda practice in India. This revival has brought him colossal profit—the Patanjali group’s revenue recently crossed Rs 10,000 crore, leaving behind giants such as ITC, Godrej and Britannia. At the core of Ramdev’s business is a “swadeshi” outlook—he relies on the idea that Patanjali’s products are made from indigenous sources, and not only incorporate ancient Indian secrets to good health, but weaken the hold of foreign multinationals over Indian consumers. But these claims may be unfounded, Pathak-Narain writes. In the following extract, she recounts a conversation with SK Patra, a former chief executive officer of Patanjali Ayurved, in which he says that Ramdev’s famous “cow ghee” may not be cow ghee at all.

Update: On 4 August, a district court in Delhi granted an ex-parte injunction—in which the publishers were not asked to present their side—against the book. Juggernaut’s response to the injunction, which includes a list of sources and interviews Pathak-Narain used for the book, is available here

By the time 2013 rolled around, Patanjali Ayurveda factories were churning out 500 products, and hundreds of new products were being tested. Thirty scientists at Patanjali laboratories were innovating food products, Ayurvedic medicines and cosmetics every day. A steady stream of products went into Ramdev’s office for his personal inspection and approval.

Then, according to SK Patra, the CEO who helped lay the foundations for Patanjali’s phenomenal growth, came a big bang—honey. “We simply bought honey from many different suppliers, refined it, processed it, packaged it, put our label and sold it. As Patanjali honey was the cheapest it quickly swept up the market,” says Patra, explaining that it was the success of honey that made him think of ghee—a product that was destined to catapult Patanjali into the big league.

When he found a ghee producer (who worked earlier for a competing brand, Gowardhan), Patra hired his plant at first. It took him only days to realise the demand was explosive. “We needed to expand production within days! We started sourcing white butter . . . in truckloads . . . A few hundred tonnes was produced at first. Now, every day, Ramdev is manufacturing 100 tonnes of ghee. Can you imagine? And every ghee bottle is giving him a profit of fifty to sixty rupees. Each one,” says Patra.

Startlingly, according to Patra, what Patanjali often sells as “cow” ghee is not cow ghee at all. It is actually ghee that is made from white butter that is, in turn, made of the milk of various animals, not just cows, that is procured from small and marginal producers in various parts of the country, including Maharashtra and Karnataka. (White butter precedes ghee in the production process and is not as nutritious. While white butter contains butterfat and milk solids, ghee contains only butterfat. If white butter is cooked until all the milk solids are caramelised and strained, you get ghee. Ghee, now proven to be lactose- and casein-free, is not only a stable, nutrient-rich fat, but also a source of good cholesterol.)

Nandini, for instance, a milk brand owned by the Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producer’s Federation, is reportedly one of the largest suppliers of white butter to Ramdev. It collects milk from 23 lakh milk producers in 22,000 villages of the state and does not separate milk based on its source (as cow milk, buffalo milk or goat milk).

So the white butter that reaches Ramdev’s factories is derived from the milk of not just cows but buffaloes and goats too. All that Ramdev does to it is melt the sourced white butter, strain it and add some herbs to it to convert it into ghee. Ramdev “claims this is all cow’s ghee . . . but who knows? Is it cow ghee or buffalo ghee or goat ghee . . . even Ramdev does not know! He cannot know! But there it is . . . 1500 crore of his business,” remarks Patra.

Ramdev goes one step further. He sells his ghee as desi cow ghee. The distinction of the source of milk is important and has far-reaching ramifications on health. According to Keith Woodford, professor of farm management and agribusiness at Lincoln University in New Zealand and author of Devil in the Milk: Illness, Health and Politics of A1 and A2 Milk, there is a clear link between the milk we drink and a range of serious illnesses such as diabetes, heart disease, autism and schizophrenia. Woodford asserts that mixed breed cows, such as jersey cows, contain the A1 beta-casein, which triggers an adverse reaction in the human body when digested. On the other hand, the milk of many herds of Asia (including local Indian pure breed cows such as the Bos indicus) contain A2 protein—which is safer for human consumption.

Yet when Ramdev sells a kilo of what he calls “Desi Cow Ghee,” not only can he not be sure that it is “desi”—he cannot even be sure that it is cow ghee.

Ramdev’s vision for Patanjali is that he wants to produce everything that an ordinary Indian needs from sunrise to sunset. Patanjali Ayurveda even produces salt. Salt is a 10,000-crore-rupee organised industry in India. Under Patra, Patanjali Ayurveda tied up with a salt producer in Gujarat. Ramdev began to buy in bulk from them, iodise and pack the salt, and sell it. Today while a one-kilo packet of Tata salt costs Rs 20, Aashirwad Rs 18 and Saffola Rs 31, Patanjali sells it for Rs 12.

So what’s their secret? According to Patra, “Baba never cared about what the market prices were. For any product pricing, he was personally involved. He would ask how much it had cost to produce something. Then with a slim margin—he just wanted to sell.” Gunendar Kapur agrees, “He doesn’t seem to care much about the money, he cares about his own legacy. His margins are very, very low. For formal companies a profit after tax of less than 15 per cent is too low. Their investors will not be happy with that kind of a performance . . . Ramdev does not have such a limitation.”

This is an excerpt from Godman to Tycoon: The Untold Story of Baba Ramdev by Priyanka Pathak-Narain, published by Juggernaut Books. The book is available in stores and on www.juggernaut.in

Priyanka Pathak-Narain graduated from Columbia Journalism School in 2007, and wrote about the business of religion at Mint between 2007 and 2013. She won the CNN Young Journalist Award for her coverage of the Setusamudram channel project in 2007. A contributing writer for Dharavi: The City Within, she occasionally writes for the New York Times and the Condé Nast Group.

READER'S COMMENTS

35 thoughts on “Is Patanjali’s Desi Cow Ghee Even Cow Ghee?”

Does it mean Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producer’s Federation which sells milk and ghee in karnataka under the nandini brand is selling milk and ghee under cow milk and ghee brand is defrauding customers ?

It merely means that the writer doesn’t know because she hasn’t bothered to investigate but has chosen to speculate as to what the ghee is made from! For an investigative writer to NOT investigate but insinuate is telling in its self! But those who choose to believe inneundo and insinuations will. The rest will want confirmation before acceptance as fact!

It only means the writer has chosen NOT to investigate but speculate about the source and content! An investigative piece written without investigation is a clear indication as to the inneundo and insinuations!

This is a convenient extract to peddle The Caravan Magazine’s opinion (and probably not even the author’s). I don’t have anything for or against Ramdev, but extracting only that part of a book that features comments by someone who had a falling out with Ramdev and is obviously biased towards him is clearly misleading. And let me not even get started on the fact that this entire argument about ‘milk’ and ‘ghee’ is predicated on the contentious A1-A2 milk debate – a pseudo-science discourse fuelled primarily by a NZ company called A2 Milk Company that reaped direct benefits from the publication of Woodford’s book. If Pathan-Narain is such a celebrated journalist, why doesn’t her book feature the comprehensive EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) study that found that ‘No cause and effect relationship can be established between consumption of A1 or A2 milk and said diseases/ailments whatsoever’? Maybe her book does feature it and in that case Caravan decided to not include that part. It took me literally two minutes to pull out the EFSA study, so am I to believe Caravan is so lax they don’t even fact check what they publish and actually peddle pseudo science?

Why don’t write about chemical in McDonald’s dominoes coco cola , which are widely publish in USA market but are hidden In India, why Everytime target Indian company the day Indian in West start publishing these articles these companies will leave India who are trying to Monopoly and destroy local brands I wonder why Indian for salary try to harm there own culture economy while working for west agenda channel who are always bias with anti India swadeshi and Hindu approch why not write about artificial cheese , wax on Washington apple , or artificial butter . MNC also sell more inferior product in India then abroad to make money & hide due to lobbying

If somebody eats goo, will you also eat it?. Stop justifying since others are doing it doesn’t give the liberty for you to do it. So stop comparing MacDonald, PETA. Work like the Japanese.. if your product is good and Superior then you don’t need to worry about how good or bad the others are. PERIOD.

Make our products truly world class.. that should be our objective. The day our products world class nobody is going to question you. Example is AMUL.

Karn, please study the economy. When we did not have FDI, we were harming the economy more. FDI and foreign companies also create ecosystem around them and also employment- from their factories, to supplies to selling. There is a substantial part of their income that is pumped back into our country’s development. Dear Babaji does not pay any tax so while he is not making margins, he doesnt have such high costs either. even your small suppliers/manufacturers who make Indian/Desi products, pay more tax than him.

Another writer finds the use of inneundo & insinuations against Indian nationalists or indigenous companies that challenge foreign or westernized Indian companies, to make a name for themselves!

I strongly condemn the so called sannyasis (Ramdev is not one) who, after purportedly renouncing the world, having duly performed Viraja Homa and performed own sraddha, continue to behave like ordinary beings, by participating in elections, establishing commercial ventures, etc. Onve Viraja Homa is performed, the Sannyasis can no more participate in and be part of normal social and civic activities.

Priyanka pathak ji. You should have studied in Patanjali university. Perhaps you would have started love your country and our brands. You have seriously shown a disrespect to your country. Ohh. I am sorry may be this is not your country.

May be Ye article PAID ho sakta hai ya Nhi bhe kuki aajkal patanjali k against aise article bahut aate hai market mai.

Let’s talk about Ghee,

If patanjali ghee is make by cow, goats and buffalo milk then what’s the problem in this because other companies mix chemicals in ghee and at least they are not mixing chemicals in ghee.

What a bullshit article on cow milk.
Pathetic. “He doesn’t seem to care much about the money…” is that a bad thing?

Page 1 of 3123«

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *